Rolling builds - Guild Wars Forums

Isileo · Dec 14, 2007, 06:16 PM // 18:16

I keep seeing people talking about rolling a build. What are they talking about? I know what it means in most rpgs but I haven't seen anything in Guild Wars to resembles rolling a build.

Bryant Again · Dec 14, 2007, 06:26 PM // 18:26

"Rolling a build" is essentially just making and running one. If someone asks you to "roll a tiger sin," you'd make an assassin (or your assassin) set up as that particular build.

Chicken Ftw · Dec 14, 2007, 06:26 PM // 18:26

To make, basically. If someone says they're rolling shock war, they're gonna be playing that bar. Same thing with re-rolling, means they're redoing either their char or build (often both).

Not to be confused with getting rolled. If someone says you got rolled, it means you were owned (hard).

Isileo · Dec 14, 2007, 06:35 PM // 18:35

Thanks y'all. Just wondered if I was missing something that should be obvious.

Dec 14, 2007, 06:16 PM // 18:16	#1
Isileo Ascalonian Squire Join Date: Dec 2007 Profession: W/N	Rolling builds I keep seeing people talking about rolling a build. What are they talking about? I know what it means in most rpgs but I haven't seen anything in Guild Wars to resembles rolling a build.

Dec 14, 2007, 06:26 PM // 18:26	#2
Bryant Again Hall Hero Join Date: Feb 2006	"Rolling a build" is essentially just making and running one. If someone asks you to "roll a tiger sin," you'd make an assassin (or your assassin) set up as that particular build.

Dec 14, 2007, 06:26 PM // 18:26	#3
Chicken Ftw Wilds Pathfinder Join Date: May 2006	To make, basically. If someone says they're rolling shock war, they're gonna be playing that bar. Same thing with re-rolling, means they're redoing either their char or build (often both). Not to be confused with getting rolled. If someone says you got rolled, it means you were owned (hard).

Dec 14, 2007, 06:35 PM // 18:35	#4
Isileo Ascalonian Squire Join Date: Dec 2007 Profession: W/N	Thanks y'all. Just wondered if I was missing something that should be obvious.